Why it is Unproductive to Request Unhackable Technology

We have seen ample of technologies in past few years and even many more are coming on the way. These mouthwatering technologies have changed the way we live or work says Roger Samara.

For instance, drone introduction is looking to disturb local distributions. Biometric technology could make identity verification and individual security far more progressive and reliable. Furthermore, self-driving cars could alter the way people commute. Of course, in a few years, our homes might be jam-packed with smart devices meant to automate as well as simplify the lives.

But along the way, customers and even business persons are obstructing the path toward development by highlighting the dreads they have of these technologies intrinsic vulnerabilities. However, it’s counterproductive to use these vulnerabilities as points of dispute against the validity of the technology or as hindrances to stop these technologies from becoming more accessible to patrons.

Why it’s unproductive to demand perfection

In reality, it’s bad to request hack-proof technology? After all, voicing a concern shouldn’t be low if it means producing a better technology highlights Roger Samara – a computer savvy. In fact, there are some issues with making these demands including:

•    Limiting Interest in Innovation

Pushing for innovative standards makes it less tempting to invest in the latest technology. Actually, it will take more time and money to invest in a product before you can start selling it. Also, there is no assurance you will get to a point that will content customers as well as policymakers. Fact is, some companies like Amazon will likely continue to follow novel technology no matter what kind of opposition they face.

•    Putting the Burden of Safety on Others

This mindset puts the burden of safety on other objects. If you are reluctant to faith biometrics until the system is unforgeable, you are overlooking your own accountability for security. For instance, it is not the company’s liability to make sure every employee select a strong password and modify it frequently emphasis Roger Samara. It’s not their responsibility to ensure you are defending your own personal information.

•    Stirring the Goalposts

It is an informal misconception in which an increasingly more intense series of evidence is demanded earlier a claim is putative. Demanding progressively high standards of safety is an illustration of this. Every time a novel technology attains some milestone for customer defense or confidentiality, it’s not going to be good enough for a proportion of the populace. This creates a boundless cycle that can never be destroyed since even meeting impossibly high standards would outcome in even higher standards being set.

What we all should do

What does this mean? Should we stop inquiries about new technologies, just to drive further invention? Of course not! It is crucial that everyone including specialists and non-experts be shrewd when assessing new technologies.

But there is a need to comprehend that all technologies are integrally inadequate and inherently susceptible. And that every step forward is going to unlock new opportunities, both good and bad. Hence, Roger Samara suggest it’s good to hold top engineers and businesspersons to high standards, but not quixotically so.